-
Posts
9,311 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by GAMBLER
-
-
If you need help Keith, I have done a lot of boards over the years. It is simple.
-
I wouldn't want twin outboards due to the cost of replacing down the road. A new drive and engine for an I/O is way cheaper.
-
-
-
From hours on top of hours of fishing lakers, I can tell you when the thermalcline is unstable, lake trout slide but also move offshore and suspend down deep. After extreme upwellings (like the one we had last week) lakers disappear until stable weather returns. Last year after early July, the lakers were not in their usual haunts. They were pushed offshore by unstable thermalclines. If nets were out during this time, they results would be inaccurate. I am encouraged by the stuff I am hearing about the meeting the other night but I'm still optimistic because of the numbers of lakers I see on a daily basis makes me a little nervous about the future of the Alewife population. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United
-
My only issue with that graph is it is only one year of decline. Last year, unstable weather pushed fish all over the place (just like the salmon). After early July, lakers were not in there normal areas. If we see a decline for two years in a row, then I will be a believer that the laker population is in decline. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United
-
-
-
-
-
I fish lakers more than most and own a business selling lake trout lures. If anyone should be against it, it should be me. I see the writing on the wall. If we don't have kings, we will not have much of a sport fishery on Lake Ontario and I can kiss my business goodbye! I also see that the adult lake trout population is a big part (bigger than the DEC admits) of the issue that could be in our future if the alewives numbers are what the data says they are. Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United
-
If the data is true, I'm all for cuts too. My only issue is the growing lake trout population. Lakers out number kings by numbers for sure. There are 4 year classes of salmon max. Lakers, there could be WAY more. They say cutting laker stocks will not do anything for four years but the laker biomass we have will put a hurting on the population. We need to raise the creel limit and fish them. The cuts also need to be put on the lakers.
-
-
-
-
The adult laker population has been climbing for the past couple years even with stocking short falls recently. This should be enough reason to support a laker cut along with the king cut they are proposing. If they want to be proactive about the future of the fishery, the long living lake trout population needs to be cut. If a stocking cut does not happen for lakers, the creel limit needs to be increased to knock the population down to save alewives.
-
-
-
Over priced docks for a channel that will still fill in after the break wall is complete. The wall across the front is not enough. We need piers like the Oak to keep the channel from filling in. One NE wind and it is going to take the sand that surrounds the front of Braddocks and dump it right in the channel.
-
-
-