Jump to content

Sk8man

Professional
  • Posts

    13,859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sk8man

  1. Chris (Momay 4000) explained it perfectly.
  2. Geez Nick isn't that the same model as all your other ones? Ought to try something different
  3. http://deepwater.cayugafisher.net/ Nice fish!
  4. The 5 ft per color is thought to be the rough estimate. There are a lot of variables to consider though such as waves messing with your speed, trolling direction (e.g.into vs. against the wind) differences between the 18 lb and 27 lb and 45 lb test, underwater currents, and what you are running for a terminal lure (e.g. stick, diver, spoon, magnum vs. regular size) possibly whether running down the chute or from a big board pulling it up and down in rough water) etc. and perhaps even the size and length of your leader. All that comes into play in terms of the exact depth you achieve. One of the ways you can examine this is to get something like a Fishawk TD and run it on your line for a closer estimate with different setups and experiment. This will give you a closer estimate than applying the standard "guesstimate".
  5. Lets hope so Alec Good idea too.
  6. Also you may wish to consider hooking safety lines to your rods (near the reel with strong clips) as an added precaution. I do so especially on other folks boats as I tired of contributing to the fish Gods cache of rods
  7. Please give my best regards to your dad Kev and I hope he gets back in action soon.
  8. I hear you Justin. Better to be safe than sorry as far as I'm concerned as you can't count on someone "believing you" but I I think like much of the law the onus would be on the person to prove it did come from there not the officer proving you didn't
  9. The only caution I can think of is that you have to stay away from setting the dipsey past the last # (e.g. 3) as most of the time it will bring the dipsey to the surface
  10. Frozen bait falls under the same regs too You still have to have a receipt for certified bait that is within 10 days old. As far as commercial prepared bait there is no date limitation but you have to have the original packaging for it. A potential problem with the uncertified bait reg when used in the water in which it was caught is that you have no proof that it was caught there so it would seem that it could possibly be risking a ticket using it even according to the applicable regulations.
  11. Gordy Clow. He was also a trapper and I used to get my bait from him at this place and he skinned his hides there and there would be all sorts of hides on the floor of his place . He was a real character and I ran into him last year at that sawbelly place when he delivered some so he is still at it.
  12. The lady is certified for them and issues a receipt with the number sold, date and her signature on the receipt. It is totally legitimate and she has been in business for many years. The guy who supplies the bait for years used to live next door to her and was a bait dealer too and supplied nearly every shop in this area. You can transport bait that is certified and you have a receipt that is within 10 days old and contains the above info on the receipt. The provision regarding use within the same body of water is referring to bait caught in that body of water that is uncertified and can only be used in that water. There is however a prohibition of possession or use in certain bodies of water as listed in the DEC regs e.g. Honeoye and others.
  13. That is where I was going to say as well. She lives in the white house just east of where Churches (later Bob's Matresses) was and on the same side I think they are $10 a dozen.
  14. Gator is right....the problem isn't with the "worker bees" themselves. There are a lot of dedicated people lending their respective talents to the process but the troubling part is the type of influences from higher up (both at the state and federal levels) to meet the demands of their own agendas and this seems to be where "transparency" breaks down and the "conclusions" from the various data collection efforts and research may be "corrupted".
  15. It has to be great just to be out there solo without distractions enjoying that beautiful great little lake. Good luck out there.
  16. Nice going Mike. Sorry I wasn't able to make it today ....sounds as though you had some fun anyway despite me not being there to bust your gourds
  17. I think the 16 lb weight may be the origin of your problem. Those older models were rated for a maximum of 10 lbs so my hunch is that it has placed a continuous strain on the motor and it may i fact be failing but also you may want to try out a 10 lb weight on it and see if it is merely the 16 lbs itself that is the problem. They are slow regardless of weight though.
  18. I used to run a stacked rod above cowbells usually for rainbows while targeting lakers on the cowbells so I kept the stacked rod with just a spoon quite aways above the cowbell setup and no tangles.
  19. 2lbperch - I think you might be OK with a 3/0 SS Siwash hook (Mustad I think 9510?) IT should be close enough to the treble in weight.
  20. Nice going Chas and it paid not to get too discouraged during the pre-fishing and sticking it out Congrats!
  21. WTG Justin Some great "cheek scallops" there too
  22. Brian makes some great points about the lakers and he knows them very well. There are huge differences in the feeding habits of lakers vs. chinooks and lakers may live at least 10 to 15 times as long as a chinook. A very critical difference in their feeding habits in addition to diversity of diet is that chinook are thought be be nearly entirely suspended prey feeders (they are pelagics and in their native ocean environment this makes good sense but with a shift to gobies and others in diet that are bottom dwelling they are screwed by their genetics). They do not heavily feed on the bottom structure like the lakers so when the bait goes deeper the lakers are right with them down there while the chinook are ranging throughout the water column looking for suspended bait. Yes they do go deep looking for them but they are not bottom feeders like the lakers. This can make a huge difference in their survival rate during "hard times".
  23. It is hard to give a complete answer your question because there are so many variables involved. The currents run in various directions on the lake and are not just one single entity that is highly predictable. They vary from place to place and in intensity as well as up and down in the water column and over structure where it occurs and in relation to water temperature changes. If you carefully observe the angle of your lines and become familiar how they act with different types of setups often you can estimate whether you are running against, across or with the current and possibly whether your lures are running correctly. Is this method as accurate as something such as a Fishawk with down speed? NO but it has been used successfully by seasoned fishermen for a long time even prior to all the existing technology. Accurately assessing this is dependent on knowing some of the traits of the lines you are using (e.g. mono, braid, wire, leadcore, copper etc.) specific to their type and diameter for example as they all behave differently in the water and have a different profile in the water column. They each have a different profile in the water and also depending on what you are running with them (e.g. dipseys. spinneys, dodgers, harnesses or lone spoons or sticks). Knowing how each of your rods acts with these lines is also important and often should be a deciding factor in their selection again depending on what you wish to do with them. The rod tip action can also tell you a lot of information about your speed and whether your lures are doing what you wish them to be doing and this is evaluated taking into consideration the angle of the line in the water and the movement of the tip of the rod itself. The downrigger cable angle is likewise an important thing to continuously monitor. Normally I try to keep mine at about a 15-30 degree angle but when you are in strong current and don't have full control over your boat speed and it depends too on what you are using for weight on the riggers this has concerns or issues (e.g. pancake, ball, fish shape, torpedo style etc.) as well as their specific weight (heavier usually less "blowback" ) but each of them differs too because of their shape and this may be more pronounced in current situations too. It also depends on what you are targeting because their are times fishing for steelies, and salmon running fast capable spoons or sticks that I exceed this angle significantly. If you have a good reliable fish finder you need to continuously monitor how your downriggers appear on there and adjust accordingly but there are limits connected with boat speed such that just letting out more cable if your weights are too light and your speed is too high may not achieve what you desire. I wouldn't forget about GPS speed as it is better than nothing but it doesn't directly correlate with what is going on at the lure level especially in light of the currents you mentioned. It is sort of a relative measure so when you connect with fish using certain setups at a certain GPS speed it can be productive to return to that speed but you have to realize that things down below (e.g. currents can change and at different depth with the same setup things run differently). I know I am giving you a long winded incomplete answer to your question but it is important to understand these basic things and to apply them to the situation as you experiment and find the things that work for you in your boat in your situation at a particular time. The best answers to these questions come from experimenting for yourself over time. This stuff is just something to think about in the meantime. Good luck out there.
  24. I always enjoy hearing Vince and Tom's take on things and I think in this situation they have hit on important factors that should be considered in the equation regarding this predator/prey balancing act but I also recognize that the decisions made regarding this issue may be very much outside this issue itself or the common sense experiential information provided by fishermen or "experts" regardless of the quality of it. Although I have never been a part of the DEC or the Albany crowd I did spend more than half my life working in a state agency as a clinician and for awhile as an administrator. The state agencies run on various revenue streams which involve the Federal Government and federal funds. These funds change from time to time to accomodate new Federal regulations and mandates which require the state to change their tactics and procedures (i.e. meeting the Feds requirements) in order to secure these funds as "new" revenue streams supporting their activities so they can continue doing and offering the things and services that they are presently involved in and they protect these vigorously. Where this may become important in this situation s that the Feds seem to be pushing the lake trout as a "native" species or "natural inhabitant" of the Great Lakes with attached funding that may support side efforts of the DEC and perhaps other related agencies as well I don't know. The point I'm getting to here is that regardless of all the incoming information the state receives that seems to make sense to us as fishermen (whether sports angler or charter folks) they have a strong vested interest in maintaining their current revenue streams so things that may interfere with this may go by the wayside. The chinook salmon may be one such "casualty" and not because of the predator/prey balance but because of bureaucratic involvement in the decision making process and the states vested interests. Chinook are my favorite fish out of all whether salt or fresh water and I find the current state of things very disturbing in terms of their future. We question why the state doesn't take into account the money coming in from fishing activities etc.it is because they don't directly receive the sum total of those dollars but they do with their revenue streams which are directly related to their valued activities.
  25. Very interesting info (as well as disconcerting about the near future....lets hope for a mild winter (s) Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...