-
Posts
13,858 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Sk8man
-
Thanks tinfin your guess is as good as mine on the fight etc. I've often wondered if it was because they may have been hooked before and got away and they know what is coming when they see the net especially. Also some of them seem to instinctively go for your other lines or head straight down and toward the prop of the motor. I think they may be a little smarter than we give them credit for
-
Yes good to have some of different sizes. The 71's are good when fish are feeding on larger sawbellies or smelt (rare now) but sometimes they mainly want smaller spoons especially the silvers. I've had good luck with the Great Lakes #44's and the #35's especially on the Fingers but they all seem to work well and are well made.
-
-
No. The owner Jason is just getting his website together so he is on Facebook right now. I don't do social media so I don't have the exact URL unfortunately.
-
Wow that is a shame. The first year I pulled it off two rods because of the stretch but after trying different stuff I went back to it because it still did a better job as far as the fleas and I figured I could live with the stretch problem. This 30 lb stuff no matter what brand still feels like rope to me after fishing for so many years with 10-12 lb
-
:lol: Luckily nothing hit my leadcore last time out as it still had 12 lb leader on it for same reason Mike
-
Have a look at the Great Lakes Lures on Facebook....they work great and hold up well. Also the smaller Revolution spoon for the Finger Lakes.
-
Each of these things mentioned has a plus and minus sign attached to it . At this time of the season the water fleas (and especially this year) heavily influence a decision regarding what to run. The fleas rapidly accrue on braided line even 50 lb or more. The types of line that seem to do better with them are 27 lb lead core, copper line, and 30 lb test Bloodrun Sea Flee mono. Some folks swear by 30 lb Big Game mono (and I've used it for years) but with heavy fleas even that gets clogged up. Right now is a real test of anything you put down there in most of these lakes and the only way to deal with most setups is to keep checking and clearing your lines VERY frequently (say at 15 min. intervals). The major problem is when you are reeling in a fish with the fleas on your line (and especially the big highly active ones on Lake O) in that you have to clear the fleas on the way in and they are sometimes like ropes hanging on your line and they take time to clear all the while the fish is fighting and this process also introduces slack in the line allowing the fish to frequently get off. An additional thing to consider right now is that in the Finger Lakes many of the fish are usually going deep about now so your setups need to be able to reach down to get them so if you aren't using downriggers some type of weighting system may be needed on your lines to get down there. During the early months of the season lead cores, short coppers, braid lines on boards, and even toplines work well when there aren't fleas and when the fish are in shallower regions of the lakes but in late summer you need to get down to them and when you do you will encounter the fleas at varying depths and in varying concentrations throughout the water column so this imposes limitations on what particular setups you use as well. Whether you decide to go with leadcore or braid (or copper) boards or no boards without dipseys you'll have to use some sort of weight system to get there. An exception to this on some of the Fingers for instance is targeting bug feeding rainbows near the surface out in deep water (150 ft plus) and fishing with boards with very small spoons near the surface but again you'll have to clear lines frequently. Mike I'd be glad to meet with you again to go over the boards etc. if you wish just PM me.
-
The way I look at it is just one more possible weak link added to the setup. I abandoned them in the early eighties. I seldom lose fish and in my view they are unnecessary if the drag is set properly and your hooks are kept very sharp (something that is often neglected) but it is another one of those issues that is mainly personal preference and if someone feels they have confidence in them and they are useful to their particular setup then that's fine too.
-
-
-
I've had contact with Brad both by email and talked with him in person in the past as well as recently and he is a very knowledgeable guy. It looks as though at present at least we may still have a puzzle with some missing pieces.....pretty cool topic that generated a lot of interest and fun debating about it anyway. Maybe the future will hold a clearer answer and supply the missing pieces of the puzzle. Thanks for the fun Mike.
-
The Spro #2 and # 3 coastlock swivel snaps are the same length - - 1 1/4 inches long. The #2 is 45 lb test while the #3 is 60 lb test.The difference is basically the diameter of the wire I believe. I think what you are referring to as far as the action is that the coastlock snap has a slight angle to it at the front end vs. a truly rounded front end on either a standard snap or a duolock snap. therein lies the question. It may make a difference especially with a spoon without a split ring as the edge of the hole in the spoon can seat in the angle of the coastlock snap and may influence the action of the spoon. On a spoon with a split ring it may do it but probably not as much. Any change in action could go either way in terms of success though. For many years I have used the solid ring ball bearing swivels but attach a duolock snap instead of the coastlock because the rounded end allows a lot of freedom of the spoon whether it is superior is open to question because folks that use coastlocks still catch fish For sticks I use just the ball bearing swivel at the end of the mainline to leader connection or in some cases place one about 3 foot from the spoon and use just the small duolock snap or an extra large size (still very small) Fast Snap to fasten to the stick bait.
-
You may also want to try using Deeper Divers (formerly Walker not sure now) in the 124 mm size I have bumped bottom in 127 ft of water with 275 ft out at 2.1 mph set on zero so you have a pretty nice range to work with especially if going for lakers down deep or even kings down deep on Lake O. As far as the pigtails you need to use a high quality SOLID RING heavy duty swivel on your main line connection for spinneys or flashers as at higher speeds they can ravel up your line if some part of it get twisted.
-
FLEAS
Sk8man replied to battlehammer's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)
It does have a slippery coating on it and a lot of stretch as well. What I have found with the Black releases is that I have to make about 8 or 10 loops before putting it in the arm and it helps reduce the "line creep" rather than the 3 - 6 I put in with other line. I've used the Sea Flee for about 3 seasons and it does work well reducing the fleas and holds up pretty well but if the flea infestation is real severe it seems that nothing seems to be "bullet proof" -
-
-
FLEAS
Sk8man replied to battlehammer's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)
-
A couple of things of interest in Mikes pic above.....I zoomed in on the adipose fin of each fish and in the first one (definite bow) there are spots on the adipose fin yet on the questionable fish there are none in evidence. Secondly although not much of the anal fin is visible on the fish in question what does show in the pic looks darker than the rainbow taken from the same water (different strains or different species?)
-
-
I went over a whole bunch of pics of rainbows and kings I have caught on the Fingers and Lake O in the past (unfortunately didn't have anything that size though) and I have to admit after looking at all the variations in each species I'm not quite as sure as I was previous to that regarding the ID. The fact that the specimen looks a bit sickly adds to the possible confusion. I'd leave it to the experts on this one.
-
Steelhed fishing in olcott
Sk8man replied to stillfishing's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)
Now that's what I call a useful report Mark -
You need to stay away from any hull features that might create turbulence so your choices may be somewhat limited by that sometimes it amounts to the "lesser of evils" and trying to get the best possible placemment out of the available choices.
-
FLEAS
Sk8man replied to battlehammer's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)
The flea concentrations seem to vary quite a bit throughout the lakes and within the water column as well. Once the concentrations reach very high levels they will stick to just about anything including 150 lb downrigger wire for several feet sometimes. I know some folks figure that the specific lines they are using may "protect" them but if they glide through real high concentrations there isn't much that will keep them off although some lines are better at it than others (e.g. Sea Flee on riggers). The more vertical your lines (e..g. downriggers) are the more of the water column is covered and the higher the chances of encountering them and they also "seem to "cluster" in the thermocline so about the only thing that can be done is to keep checking and clearing lines and despite it being a PIA it offers a chance to change lures and setups and often while either pulling in or setting out fish may hit them. Trying to look on the "positive" side of it -
Thanks for the vote of confidence Mike.....coming from you that is a real compliment but I'm not a fisheries biologist either and it could be some genetically mixed up combo. I know for a while back in time the cohos and kings were cross breeding somehow on Lake O and that was a real question mark at that time until they took a close look at the genetic profiles so stuff like that can occur but the main features that John mentioned and that characteristic black mouth sure strongly suggests king, and full spotting of the tail, and spotting of dorsal (which wouldn't be if coho) and although it is hard to tell from the angle of the pic the head looks somewhat disproportionate to the body suggesting it might be malnourished too so the body could then be more slender too than that of a healthy king for its size throwing off ones perception of its body shape as looking like a rainbow or coho. The anal fin would have been an important marker to have seen too as the fin rays would usually be 15 to 17 for a king (13 to 15 for coho) (As already mentioned the connection to Lake O via the canal system is there as it is to the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific salmon are known to wander thousands of miles in the ocean environment so the trek from Lake O would not be out of the question from a distance standpoint. It certainly is an interesting specimen and it would be good to know what the Cornell folks or DEC biologists think.