-
Posts
13,865 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Sk8man
-
I feel for ya Gino. I have one of them and have had it for 20 plus years and they are great. Hope you find it.
-
smart troll vs fish hawk
Sk8man replied to Hooked on Kings's topic in Questions About Trout & Salmon Trolling?
Great points Mark thanks. -
When to use flashers/dodger
Sk8man replied to nathaniel's topic in Questions About Trout & Salmon Trolling?
Here are the basic differences between flashers and dodgers and a pic of a Spin Doctor as well. There are also different sizes available in these items. Pic 1 is the face or front side of (from left to right) 2 number 0 dodgers (blue/silver one and red one) Note the slight cupping on the ends that gives rise to a gentle swaying back in forth in terms of action Next to the right is a flasher (wonderbread design) with a fly different shaped bends in the ends without cupping giving a more pronounced but generally tighter back and forth motion or action On the right is a Spin Doctor/ fly setup It has a very different action than both the dodger or flasher it revolves round and round making the fly come through the water erratically back and forth. There are two sets of attachment holes one set at each end and placement determines the speed /action of the fly Pic 2 is the undersides of each item - Note the little rudder like affair at the end of the flasher and Spin Doctor and its absence on the dodger -
I think it is just the northenders that are superior at Seneca Kev....but I could be wrong
-
-
-
If you are referring to the Hammerhead cowbells it has been pointed out that they are made of light weight aluminum instead of plastic http://www.hammerheadchartersandtackle.com/page8.html
-
smart troll vs fish hawk
Sk8man replied to Hooked on Kings's topic in Questions About Trout & Salmon Trolling?
digitroll - good comeback with the automatic vs. manual transmission but I'd also ask if you are stuck in mud or a snowbank which would you be glad to have to get your butt out ? I can also do a lot of steering myself despite fishing solo for the two grand for an autopilot I too use whatever technological advancements I can afford and they certainly "help". The case I was making is that many folks (especially those just starting out) who may be viewing things here can get the idea that this stuff is "indispensable" and "essential" to catching any fish when that is not actually the case. There are many very successful fishermen on here that don't own either device that are still "whacking" them and I just thought someone should mention that in the midst of the discussion. I'm as interested in the info in this thread as anyone. -
smart troll vs fish hawk
Sk8man replied to Hooked on Kings's topic in Questions About Trout & Salmon Trolling?
Back in the mid seventies we used flashers (depth finders) to locate fish and a manual fishawk thermometer on a reel to determine where the thermocline was located and tried to fish accordingly. We caught quite a few fish and also the same with manual downriggers etc. Prior to that we used markings at intervals on the anchor rope to find depth for stillfishing for trout (which is why my arms are still sore today ). When I managed to get my first Heathkit graph that had to be hand assembled by my dad in 1976 or so I remember a woman saying "That is very unfair....those fish don't have any chance at all now and that is poor sportsmanship" The point I am getting to is that we get increasingly dependent on the technological side of this sport and the newest and greatest "gizmo" and if you are chartering it may be very desirable to go this route but there are a lot of folks who frequent this website that may or may not be able to afford this stuff that is being presented as "necessary" to catching fish successfully. I would say to the newbies viewing these things learn the basics of trolling and fishing before getting all wrapped up in the technology. Learning the basic skills such as learning to troll in the most productive directions, looking for signs of currents, watching for changes in wind direction and speed, gauging the angle of your lines and position of rod tips, paying close attention to details in all that you do while out there and the results of your actions and watching other more experienced anglers closely etc. If you fail to learn these basics all the technology in the world isn't going to put you consistently on fish. The technological advancements can "fine tune" or supplement these skills......and....what do you do when the technology breaks down or doesn't function properly? -
Dennis you didn't mention whether your downrigger is manual or electric and if electric whether the specs for it allow the heavier weights. One of the critical factors that may be as important as weight is the design of the weight. The torpedo weights in 10 lbs are manageable for both types of downriggers and cut through the water nicely with less blowback than the traditional cannonball or older fish weights. A couple guys here on LOU make great downrigger weights that incorporate newer design features- Troutman87 (Harvey) and bikinibottom (Rich). I know Rich fishes during the season and probably doesn't make the weights right now but Harvey probably does. I'd send an inquiry via PM
-
I just ordered a set today of the Firebelly jacket and Toadskin pants My more than 20 year old Goretex rain suit was losing some of its repellency but I guess i got my money's worth out of it
-
Can't put your nose too close to it mark
-
Sodus 6/26-6/27
Sk8man replied to skeletonfish's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)
-
The search for "Seneca Gold" is sort of like prospecting for real gold and the locations of the "mines" are hard to come by from veteran local fishermen. This time of year and given where you are launching from I'd say try right in Glass Factory Bay just to the north of Roy's (near where the Geneva Country Club is) and start out in 15 -20 ft of water and drift around looking for them. Go deeper if you can't locate them in shallow. They can be anywhere this time of year. Softshell crabs (expensive if you can even find them use half at a time) or small grass crabs, left over spikes or fat head minnows usually work either on small jigs or just with usual double hook and line set ups with sinker at bottom. depending on wind/wave conditions can either drift for them or try to locate and then anchor away from them and cast back into them. They spook easily in the clear water and shallow and electric trolling motors can help. Good luck.
-
Fair Haven fishing
Sk8man replied to Playin Hookey's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)
-
Have You Been Spooled? Here's a tip to stop it.
Sk8man replied to WillCFish's topic in Tackle and Techniques
-
Any Honeoye and Silver Lake advisories?
Sk8man replied to tbulhead's topic in Finger Lakes Discussion
Yeah and don't be anywhere near the water on weekends at night because there are a lot of drunks running at full speed without lights (seriously) -
Lake Ontario Colder Than Michigan & Huron This Year
Sk8man replied to ut_falcon's topic in Open Lake Discussion
Lake Superior has the greatest average depth -
-
They are productive spoons with very durable and creative paint jobs and both sizes work well on Lake O.You might want to get some of both sizes. If you are looking for greater selection or variety in spoon action and shape as well as good durable paint consider also Great lakes Lures which have been highly effective for me in both the Finger Lakes and Lake O. They are both high quality spoons by local guys and they deserve our support.
-
I don't truly pretend to know why any of these things work but after being able to fool them somehow you keep doing whatever works. Colors are a good example of this.....who knows for sure whether fish (trout and salmon in particular ) actually distinguish between specific colors but when you catch one you send it back down to hopefully catch another on that same spoon or fly or stick and if you do you assume that it was the color that did the trick. Problem is it may have been that particular spoon or its action or its proximity to that particular fish (or many other variables) that accounted for the success. We make a lot of assumptions in this "game" and some of them may not be true some or all of the time. Some of the things are kind of like human "superstitious" behavior too. The lure manufacturers are masters at creating this illusion and I am a prime example of someone who has fallen for it time and again
-
It really isn't mainly as much a question of enough action it is more of the "right action". The attractor serves the main purpose of the "action" part of things (e.g. making a commotion in the water) so once you have the fishes attention he needs to be fooled into thinking he has something "vulnerable" or "wounded" that appears to be a meal. Sometimes scent helps this along considerably too.
-
Mark makes a real good point in differentiating between a "spin" and a roll or "corkscrew". He is correct in his terminology and it is specifically what I meant and an important distinction . If the bait is truly "spinning" it usually doesn't work properly. The bend determines the way it comes through the water and it often takes some experimenting to get it right and it appears "wounded" rather than just spinning in a rhythm behind the attractor.
-
Rochester 6/27
Sk8man replied to Missdemeanor's topic in New York Fishing Reports - Lake Ontario (South Shore)