Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I personally have used the sub-troll for many years - and I bought it because I like to look at it from the back of the boat - and with the analog dial - it's very easy to read, I don't like having to process thr digital bumber - and with the other units they are hard to see from a distance...just my 2 cents worth.

Posted

Yes it does. But not a problem like some of the stories you hear on here. Both products are good. Just have to decide what your preferences are. This is another of those scotty vs cannon debates. Either product will serve you well. Good luck with your decision.

Sent from my iPhone using Lake Ontario United

Posted

I have both sub troll and the fish hawk X4D on the boat.

They both do the job and the display is all about personal choice.

Sub troll transmits the signal through a coated cable while the fish hawk requires a transom mount transducer to receive the signal.

Again all about personal choice.

Another transducer with holes in the boat or maintenance of the coated cable.

 

Your question was what unit was the best bang for the buck?

I would say the sub troll.

Posted

Both!  Find Steelhead water with one unit and King water with the other.

Posted

Subtroll hands down. Not just because i sell them and their parts, i say analog is the only way to go. Plus you don't have to do anything outside the boat. If and when you get one and ever have a issue let me know and i will take of you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...